Sorry, there has been a problem.
You cannot access this article because you do not currently have a valid subscription. Please use the options below to create a subscription. If you have any queries about your account please contact our subscriptions department or telephone free 0800 137201 (UK callers only) or +44 (0)1722 716997 for callers outside the UK.
Angie Hart, Flis Henwood, Andrea Jones
British Journal of Midwifery 11(1): 53
- 57
(Jan 2003)
Midwives know from experience that the history of the introduction of maternity computer systems is not entirely a positive one. The idea that such systems will invariably make their working lives easier and will benefit client care is not an idea to which they naively subscribe. The authors' recent survey of the Heads of Midwifery (HoMs) suggests that HoMs are more optimistic about the benefits to be gained by the introduction of electronic patient records (EPRs) than some of the evidence from their past experiences with maternity computer systems might suggest. The survey results also lend support to the hypothesis that involvement of system users in the procurement of information systems will make such systems more acceptable to them. Finally midwives should mobilize their considerable experience as clinicians and as managers with regard to the introduction of maternity computer systems, both to be rightly cautious of the claims made by EPR advocates and suppliers, and to influence procurement decisions within NHS Trusts.
To view this article

